Positive euthanasia, who needs it? Who hopes to die or is about to die? The former would think of it as the light, the latter would use it by his sure decision without regretting before suffering also after he did the rest thing. It is for everyone involved in the death. Regardless, whether you are accepting to die, and your idea, you will age and die someday. If you tried to commit suicide, you could get stopped by a righteous people. Moreover, you could become a mass murderer for the death penalty. Euthanasia is conducted by administering sleeping medicine and dying in sleeping. The medicine named "Pentobarbital" is known as an oral sleeping pill "Rabona" and, you will be able to commit self-euthanasia by overdosing on the pills. Anyway, whether you die or not, it is meaningful to have the option to die at any time you want. Suicide is not easy also abhorred and in Japan. Nowadays, individual rights are becoming more respected in the world and so it is with euthanasia and, some countries legalize it. Then, there is no reason not to legalize it in Japan. While some opinions say that euthanasia may destroy capitalism in Japan, it may be a real problem if you want the country to continue in its current form. Recently, "Oyagacha"(親ガチャ) which become famous on the Internet in Japan. It means life is decided by random parents like a capsule toy machine. You cannot deny it. There is no way to know their opinion about life before they are born. Some people wish they had never been born when they have trouble, and it would make sense to suppress stress too. For this reason, you should be given the right to die. Therefore, positive euthanasia is necessary for all people, regardless of disabilities, you to have the right to self-determination and end their lives without suffering and positive euthanasia should be legalized in Japan. Firstly, euthanasia should be allowed in Japan because the right to peacefully finish one’s life should be given as the right of self-determination. Anti-natalism in utilitarian terms, there is a famous theory in the world. Benatar, D. (2006) demonstrated that having not been born is better than anything else as the ^ title “The Harm of Coming Into Existence”. This famous theory was released in 2006. In summary, pleasure is good, and no pleasure is ok. Suffering is bad, and no suffering is best. Then, no pleasure, no suffering, and not being born is better or happier than another also, antinatalism does not force living people to die, but giving more birth should be avoided. Some people say that death is the worst suffering, but ^ it is relative. For some people, death is hope. ^ Euthanasia will save people's rights. This idea can conflict with traditional values, which focus on productivity and capitalism treating some people like slaves, but the problem would be small because only a suicide applicant commits it. Originally, according to Britannica ProCon.org, euthanasia was not admitted due to religious background (History of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide). Now, because of the movement, 10,000 people a year are dying from euthanasia worldwide. Also, the source points out the link to the Nazis. ^ Nazis killed 70,000 disabled people in the name of euthanasia. It was for making a productive country at that time, but it should be blamed now. Euthanasia reputation was down in the US at that time. By the way, euthanasia is allowed for only serious diseases. According to the Lisbon declaration which conducted patients' rights, as defined by the World Medical Association stated, “Patients have the right to humane end-of-life care and all possible assistance in dying with as much dignity and ease as possible” (1981). Nevertheless, cases that patients are seeking death ^ from pain are neglected. Also, the cause of death 10% is senility so relatively painless, and Brock and Foley (1996) reported about 30% of them feel suffering in the end. This ratio seems the same in Japan. Everyone must experience death, and then euthanasia should be applied for suffering at that time. In Japan, passive euthanasia called dignified death is admitted as general. So, discontinuing treatment, which is removing the respiratory system, not having gastrostomy, not having feeding by intravenous drip, in that you can get painkillers, but there is no guarantee you can die peacefully. Positive euthanasia is used for someone who wants them to keep dignity it. In the Netherlands, you can commit euthanasia when you are in dementia. It is caused by the background that Europe is more individualistic. Moreover, the Children could not care for their parents, but they do not prolong life without depriving dignity (Shimada, 2021). Next, Euthanasia should be allowed in Japan because some people want euthanasia but do not have access to it. There is a disease named ALS which is a progressive disease that causes plants to have a vegetable-like state, except for a few breathing and eye movements. If they want to commit suicide, they will take ^ euthanasia abroad, wait for passive euthanasia in Japan, or use suicide assistance. There is ^ an accident that a patient asks another doctor to assist the suicide for money. As a result, the patient is dead, and the doctor was arrested. Attending doctor seems not to be known. So, for the surviving ALS and suicide applicant, the latter intention was disregarded. They cannot commit it in Japan ^ their right to commit euthanasia should be allowed. Of cause, euthanasia should also be allowed for suicide applicants for mental reasons. According to the Japan Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2021), physical health problems, including the aforementioned ALS, account for 15% of the total cause of death. As for the others ^ , ^ depression is nearly half, but its causes are complex and largely psychological. In the Netherlands, Canada, and Switzerland people with severe mental illness and disease are admitted to committing suicide. There was a case that ^ who experienced another family member’s death leading to suicide idea. Thus, People ^ easily think about suicide. For example, having a disability, bankruptcy, bereavement, divorce, debt, bullying ^ . There are some support services for personal bankruptcy, ^ public assistance, but the safety service will be awake. Also, the intention for euthanasia should be carefully confirmed. In the survey, many opinions are supposed not to desire life-prolonging treatment, but few people express their opinions in advance legally. It is difficult to think ^ in ^ case of an emergency. If you have a traffic accident, you will be resuscitated, but maybe you had a vegetable-like state or disability. If you cannot make the decision yourself, you will give your control to your spouse, siblings, ^ parents. ^ If you gradually weaken, you will be able to consult with your doctor about the future. In the Netherlands, there is a case ^ that conducted euthanasia according to the pre-instruction ^ without again oral confirmation. Thirdly, euthanasia should be allowed even gently because there is not enough discussion in Japan. When ^ Japan Dignified the Death Legislation Association and handed out the draft ^ to the Member of Congress, a group of people with disabilities opposed the draft. They said that it will promote prejudice for people with disabilities to ^ die. Though The draft does not say people with disabilities should die. It gives disabilities ^ a choice and also healthy people who want to die. So, the right to euthanasia should be given to everyone who is not disabled. Ando (2021) criticizes the fact that those who can be euthanized are limited to the seriously ill. In other words, he criticizes the fact that euthanasia is only available to the poorest people in society, saying that it is the same as telling them to die. Moreover, the president of the Japan Medical Association also said that euthanasia is not a medical act. It violates the Lisbon declaration and goes against time. ^ Japanese euthanasia law is not legalized now, but there are the End-of-life medical process guidelines from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2017) but, there reported that 33% of doctor does not know the guideline, ^ 22% does not use it as a reference, so the effect is limited. Also, there are no statistics whether how many Japanese ^ committed passive euthanasia or ^ dignified death. Moreover, to have surly passive euthanasia, you will go to a notary public to make a Notarized Declaration of Death with Dignity, ^ also need the witness and the guideline does not show specific medical practice ^ and in small hospitals, euthanasia may not be possible due to equip and liability issues. There will be a concern about whether euthanasia may break capitalism in Japan, but it cannot be helped. There is a problem in the country and social system. Suicide occurs due to various factors such as bullying, black companies, low wages, and lack of prenatal diagnosis. Suicide is microscopic, and it may be difficult to stop suicide because of its temperament. Also, if euthanasia becomes widespread, then train delay and murders ^ for the death penalty will decrease. It is a serious problem. In the Netherlands, 6,000 people die annually, but society has not collapsed. In conclusion, Positive euthanasia should be allowed in Japan. In summary, the right to die should be an option for all people as the right of self-determination. Also, in other countries, it is allowed for only seriously ill people, but the ^ gray areas such as ALS, it is not allowed in Japan, and even with the declining birthrate and aging population, there are still taboos that block the discussion which should go on. Finally, the right to die would be a certain relief, and everyone will not want anyone to control their right to die comfortably since everyone was born involuntarily. There is nothing wrong with the person as a reason to die, so it would be nice to have it to escape.